Valkyria Chronicles Questions

Does anyone else agree that the second and third games should have been on the ps3 as well.I mean it's just that only the canvas graphics engine(playstation exclusive)can bring out the full potential of the anime style graphics,and the fact that the game started on the ps3.<BR>But I also belive that a trilogy(or a sequel for some reason)for/to this game makes no sense<BR>Because if you look at the end of valkyria chronicles,it clearly states "THE END"(not THE END?)<BR>As far I am concerned this was just an excuse for psp(whose sales were falling)to make a stand-alone game with the same name and it ruined the entire franchise.the graphics of vc2&3 fall vastly short of the original and the storyline of vc2 is so bad that a book titled "survivors of the holocoust" would be classed as a good enjoyable read:-).although,it was ok that they put vc1 on psp after it was on ps3.what I don't agree with is the fact that they chose to put the sequel and trilogy on psp and not on ps3,this was the worst mistake they could have made.after all they would have sold more if it stayed on the ps3.<BR><BR>I know that I am right and what they did was took a perfectly good game and completly gutted it,and what you see on psp are the entrails of what could have been a fantastic game on a more powerful console.(not a mediocre game on a 32bit console.)this is my question in full<BR>I would like some response if at all possible.

Date of Question: Sep 1st 2011 | Question ID: 217791

Well...if no one person wants to answer this question I will.I fully agree and back what I stated in my question because it is correct.just look at the games and see where they went wrong. (excluding vc1)vc1ended with the death of maxamillion(the ruler of the empire)and since he did not have an heir to his throne,there wasn't anyone else to take his place.which in short means that the empire was finished and future attacks from said empire would never happen.but in vc2 which is set some time after vc1 the same empire is again attacking gallia,which doesn't make any sense because the empire was destroyed with the death of maxamillion.you can probably see where they went wrong right there.I mean look at the end of vc1 it clearly states THE END. In capitals and it has a full stop which means "NO SEQUEL".Vc3 also follows the same storyline(or similar)as vc2 because yes thats right people the same empire is yet again attacking gallia(how convenient).how can an empire without a leader attack a foriegn nation,I mean without their leader where would the money or resorces come from?and since they keep losing they must be be running out people by now.a second game is ok but after that you would think that they would give up on the ragnite veins after being beaten not once but twice.I also did not like the fact that the empire resembled that of the german forces from the second world war,and at the same time making a race called darcsens which donot look or smell like the jews but the way they were treated was similar.
The darcsens were blamed for something they did not do,and the jews?well thats self- expanitory(ie:they did)I am not being racist more like anti-sametic which is not the same.I just feel that if they are going to make a war game,why not make one thats not set during WWII
For I am german,austrian and a member of the national party(nazi stazi)and find it quite insulting against my kind,but when all is said and done it's a damn good game.

PS:I am also an aryan,a real one not one of these fakes that shave their heads.
Also sorry for my comments as I know that they might offend some people.