Does anyone else agree that the second and third games should have been on the ps3 as well.I mean it's just that only the canvas graphics engine(playstation exclusive)can bring out the full potential of the anime style graphics,and the fact that the game started on the ps3. But I also belive that a trilogy(or a sequel for some reason)for/to this game makes no sense Because if you look at the end of valkyria chronicles,it clearly states "THE END"(not THE END?) As far I am concerned this was just an excuse for psp(whose sales were falling)to make a stand-alone game with the same name and it ruined the entire franchise.the graphics of vc2&3 fall vastly short of the original and the storyline of vc2 is so bad that a book titled "survivors of the holocoust" would be classed as a good enjoyable read:-).although,it was ok that they put vc1 on psp after it was on ps3.what I don't agree with is the fact that they chose to put the sequel and trilogy on psp and not on ps3,this was the worst mistake they could have made.after all they would have sold more if it stayed on the ps3.
I know that I am right and what they did was took a perfectly good game and completly gutted it,and what you see on psp are the entrails of what could have been a fantastic game on a more powerful console.(not a mediocre game on a 32bit console.)this is my question in full I would like some response if at all possible.